Waste Management

WM
1.8
Companies list

Public Statements Risk

1

Waste Management is a low-profile company. The CEO, James Fish Jr., is only active on LinkedIn and Twitter. His posts mainly consist of company achievements; but he does mention sustainability and environmental achievements. Outside of these posts, the company and Fish do not comment on political affiliations through public statements or social media.

Political Contributions Risk

3

Waste Management contributes with a moderate Republican skew with most of its contributions coming from the company PAC. The contribution level is high, but when benchmarked to the more consumer oriented organizations in the Industrials sector, it doesn't stand out. Waste Management contributes with less partisanship and in smaller amounts than its industry competitors Rollins and Republic Services. The size and partisanship of contributions raise their risk but their sector caps it.

Political Dichotomy Risk

1

Waste Management has locations throughout both the U.S. and Canada, with the majority of locations in the Southern U.S., which can imply a right-leaning consumer base on average. While the company and its executives have made considerable donations to both the Republican and Democratic parties, they have also mentioned their sustainability efforts and the importance of LGBTQ+ acceptance throughout their annual 10K and their various social media platforms. There is very little capacity for customers to boycott the company due to a lack of substitues. Thus, while political dichotomy is a slight risk, capacity to act on it is severely limited.

Associational Risk

4

Wayne Huizenga, founder of Waste Management, was a major contributor to Republican causes and has also given gifts to the controversial Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas. Having passed away, his political activities likely do not pose risks. Additionally, an employee PAC for WM contributed money to the fund of Republican Senator Eric Nesbitt who was under scrutiny in 2022 for stalling the passing of new Michigan legislation to modernization their waste management and recycling systems. Further, the company has made contributions to controversial figure Donald Trump.

Brand Visibility Risk

1

Nobody really wants to think about where their trash goes, and despite people paying more attention to sustainability, they generally don't think about their utilities outside of when bills are due. Additionally, there are generally few options for switching away from a trash company.

Political Hazard (pH) Ratings Explained

A corporation’s Political Hazard Rating, or pH rating, is an overall assessment of the corporation’s likelihood of facing a material consumer boycott or investor backlash from a controversy caused by the company’s or its executives’ political activities and proclivities. The pH ratings range from 1 to 5, with a higher rating correlating with higher risk. The categories below are the components considered when setting a company’s pH rating.

Public Statements Risk

Rates the corporation based on its executives’ and the corporations’ own prior public political statements, including their frequency and whether they have tended to be, or actually have been, controversial or high-profile.

Political Dichotomy Risk

Rates the corporation based on the dichotomy, if any, between the executives’ and/or corporations’ own prior political contributions or statements and the likely political leaning of the corporation’s consumer base.

Political Contributions Risk

Rates the corporation based on the magnitude of the executives’ and/or corporations’ total political contributions to politicians and PACs, benchmarked to sector, and the weighted nature of those contributions as between political parties.

Associational Risk

Rates the corporation based on its executives’ and/or the corporation’s own prior political contributions and/or public association with particularly controversial people or high-profile politicians or PACs.

Brand Visibility Risk

Rates the corporation's risk relative to sector with higher risk being associated with higher brand visibility

Waste Management

WM
1.8
Companies list

Public Statements Risk

1

Waste Management is a low-profile company. The CEO, James Fish Jr., is only active on LinkedIn and Twitter. His posts mainly consist of company achievements; but he does mention sustainability and environmental achievements. Outside of these posts, the company and Fish do not comment on political affiliations through public statements or social media.

Political Contributions Risk

3

Waste Management contributes with a moderate Republican skew with most of its contributions coming from the company PAC. The contribution level is high, but when benchmarked to the more consumer oriented organizations in the Industrials sector, it doesn't stand out. Waste Management contributes with less partisanship and in smaller amounts than its industry competitors Rollins and Republic Services. The size and partisanship of contributions raise their risk but their sector caps it.

Political Dichotomy Risk

1

Waste Management has locations throughout both the U.S. and Canada, with the majority of locations in the Southern U.S., which can imply a right-leaning consumer base on average. While the company and its executives have made considerable donations to both the Republican and Democratic parties, they have also mentioned their sustainability efforts and the importance of LGBTQ+ acceptance throughout their annual 10K and their various social media platforms. There is very little capacity for customers to boycott the company due to a lack of substitues. Thus, while political dichotomy is a slight risk, capacity to act on it is severely limited.

Associational Risk

4

Wayne Huizenga, founder of Waste Management, was a major contributor to Republican causes and has also given gifts to the controversial Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas. Having passed away, his political activities likely do not pose risks. Additionally, an employee PAC for WM contributed money to the fund of Republican Senator Eric Nesbitt who was under scrutiny in 2022 for stalling the passing of new Michigan legislation to modernization their waste management and recycling systems. Further, the company has made contributions to controversial figure Donald Trump.

Brand Visibility Risk

1

Nobody really wants to think about where their trash goes, and despite people paying more attention to sustainability, they generally don't think about their utilities outside of when bills are due. Additionally, there are generally few options for switching away from a trash company.

Political Hazard (pH) Ratings Explained

A corporation’s Political Hazard Rating, or pH rating, is an overall assessment of the corporation’s likelihood of facing a material consumer boycott or investor backlash from a controversy caused by the company’s or its executives’ political activities and proclivities. The pH ratings range from 1 to 5, with a higher rating correlating with higher risk. The categories below are the components considered when setting a company’s pH rating.

Public Statements Risk

Rates the corporation based on its executives’ and the corporations’ own prior public political statements, including their frequency and whether they have tended to be, or actually have been, controversial or high-profile.

Political Dichotomy Risk

Rates the corporation based on the dichotomy, if any, between the executives’ and/or corporations’ own prior political contributions or statements and the likely political leaning of the corporation’s consumer base.

Political Contributions Risk

Rates the corporation based on the magnitude of the executives’ and/or corporations’ total political contributions to politicians and PACs, benchmarked to sector, and the weighted nature of those contributions as between political parties.

Associational Risk

Rates the corporation based on its executives’ and/or the corporation’s own prior political contributions and/or public association with particularly controversial people or high-profile politicians or PACs.

Brand Visibility Risk

Rates the corporation's risk relative to sector with higher risk being associated with higher brand visibility

Waste Management

WM
1.8
Companies list

Public Statements Risk

1

Waste Management is a low-profile company. The CEO, James Fish Jr., is only active on LinkedIn and Twitter. His posts mainly consist of company achievements; but he does mention sustainability and environmental achievements. Outside of these posts, the company and Fish do not comment on political affiliations through public statements or social media.

Political Contributions Risk

3

Waste Management contributes with a moderate Republican skew with most of its contributions coming from the company PAC. The contribution level is high, but when benchmarked to the more consumer oriented organizations in the Industrials sector, it doesn't stand out. Waste Management contributes with less partisanship and in smaller amounts than its industry competitors Rollins and Republic Services. The size and partisanship of contributions raise their risk but their sector caps it.

Political Dichotomy Risk

1

Waste Management has locations throughout both the U.S. and Canada, with the majority of locations in the Southern U.S., which can imply a right-leaning consumer base on average. While the company and its executives have made considerable donations to both the Republican and Democratic parties, they have also mentioned their sustainability efforts and the importance of LGBTQ+ acceptance throughout their annual 10K and their various social media platforms. There is very little capacity for customers to boycott the company due to a lack of substitues. Thus, while political dichotomy is a slight risk, capacity to act on it is severely limited.

Associational Risk

4

Wayne Huizenga, founder of Waste Management, was a major contributor to Republican causes and has also given gifts to the controversial Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas. Having passed away, his political activities likely do not pose risks. Additionally, an employee PAC for WM contributed money to the fund of Republican Senator Eric Nesbitt who was under scrutiny in 2022 for stalling the passing of new Michigan legislation to modernization their waste management and recycling systems. Further, the company has made contributions to controversial figure Donald Trump.

Brand Visibility Risk

1

Nobody really wants to think about where their trash goes, and despite people paying more attention to sustainability, they generally don't think about their utilities outside of when bills are due. Additionally, there are generally few options for switching away from a trash company.

Political Hazard (pH) Ratings Explained

A corporation’s Political Hazard Rating, or pH rating, is an overall assessment of the corporation’s likelihood of facing a material consumer boycott or investor backlash from a controversy caused by the company’s or its executives’ political activities and proclivities. The pH ratings range from 1 to 5, with a higher rating correlating with higher risk. The categories below are the components considered when setting a company’s pH rating.

Public Statements Risk

Rates the corporation based on its executives’ and the corporations’ own prior public political statements, including their frequency and whether they have tended to be, or actually have been, controversial or high-profile.

Political Dichotomy Risk

Rates the corporation based on the dichotomy, if any, between the executives’ and/or corporations’ own prior political contributions or statements and the likely political leaning of the corporation’s consumer base.

Political Contributions Risk

Rates the corporation based on the magnitude of the executives’ and/or corporations’ total political contributions to politicians and PACs, benchmarked to sector, and the weighted nature of those contributions as between political parties.

Associational Risk

Rates the corporation based on its executives’ and/or the corporation’s own prior political contributions and/or public association with particularly controversial people or high-profile politicians or PACs.

Brand Visibility Risk

Rates the corporation's risk relative to sector with higher risk being associated with higher brand visibility

Waste Management

WM
1.8
Companies list

Public Statements Risk

1

Waste Management is a low-profile company. The CEO, James Fish Jr., is only active on LinkedIn and Twitter. His posts mainly consist of company achievements; but he does mention sustainability and environmental achievements. Outside of these posts, the company and Fish do not comment on political affiliations through public statements or social media.

Political Contributions Risk

3

Waste Management contributes with a moderate Republican skew with most of its contributions coming from the company PAC. The contribution level is high, but when benchmarked to the more consumer oriented organizations in the Industrials sector, it doesn't stand out. Waste Management contributes with less partisanship and in smaller amounts than its industry competitors Rollins and Republic Services. The size and partisanship of contributions raise their risk but their sector caps it.

Political Dichotomy Risk

1

Waste Management has locations throughout both the U.S. and Canada, with the majority of locations in the Southern U.S., which can imply a right-leaning consumer base on average. While the company and its executives have made considerable donations to both the Republican and Democratic parties, they have also mentioned their sustainability efforts and the importance of LGBTQ+ acceptance throughout their annual 10K and their various social media platforms. There is very little capacity for customers to boycott the company due to a lack of substitues. Thus, while political dichotomy is a slight risk, capacity to act on it is severely limited.

Associational Risk

4

Wayne Huizenga, founder of Waste Management, was a major contributor to Republican causes and has also given gifts to the controversial Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas. Having passed away, his political activities likely do not pose risks. Additionally, an employee PAC for WM contributed money to the fund of Republican Senator Eric Nesbitt who was under scrutiny in 2022 for stalling the passing of new Michigan legislation to modernization their waste management and recycling systems. Further, the company has made contributions to controversial figure Donald Trump.

Brand Visibility Risk

1

Nobody really wants to think about where their trash goes, and despite people paying more attention to sustainability, they generally don't think about their utilities outside of when bills are due. Additionally, there are generally few options for switching away from a trash company.

Political Hazard (pH) Ratings Explained

A corporation’s Political Hazard Rating, or pH rating, is an overall assessment of the corporation’s likelihood of facing a material consumer boycott or investor backlash from a controversy caused by the company’s or its executives’ political activities and proclivities. The pH ratings range from 1 to 5, with a higher rating correlating with higher risk. The categories below are the components considered when setting a company’s pH rating.

Public Statements Risk

Rates the corporation based on its executives’ and the corporations’ own prior public political statements, including their frequency and whether they have tended to be, or actually have been, controversial or high-profile.

Political Dichotomy Risk

Rates the corporation based on the dichotomy, if any, between the executives’ and/or corporations’ own prior political contributions or statements and the likely political leaning of the corporation’s consumer base.

Political Contributions Risk

Rates the corporation based on the magnitude of the executives’ and/or corporations’ total political contributions to politicians and PACs, benchmarked to sector, and the weighted nature of those contributions as between political parties.

Associational Risk

Rates the corporation based on its executives’ and/or the corporation’s own prior political contributions and/or public association with particularly controversial people or high-profile politicians or PACs.

Brand Visibility Risk

Rates the corporation's risk relative to sector with higher risk being associated with higher brand visibility

Waste Management

WM
1.8
Companies list

Public Statements Risk

1

Waste Management is a low-profile company. The CEO, James Fish Jr., is only active on LinkedIn and Twitter. His posts mainly consist of company achievements; but he does mention sustainability and environmental achievements. Outside of these posts, the company and Fish do not comment on political affiliations through public statements or social media.

Political Contributions Risk

3

Waste Management contributes with a moderate Republican skew with most of its contributions coming from the company PAC. The contribution level is high, but when benchmarked to the more consumer oriented organizations in the Industrials sector, it doesn't stand out. Waste Management contributes with less partisanship and in smaller amounts than its industry competitors Rollins and Republic Services. The size and partisanship of contributions raise their risk but their sector caps it.

Political Dichotomy Risk

1

Waste Management has locations throughout both the U.S. and Canada, with the majority of locations in the Southern U.S., which can imply a right-leaning consumer base on average. While the company and its executives have made considerable donations to both the Republican and Democratic parties, they have also mentioned their sustainability efforts and the importance of LGBTQ+ acceptance throughout their annual 10K and their various social media platforms. There is very little capacity for customers to boycott the company due to a lack of substitues. Thus, while political dichotomy is a slight risk, capacity to act on it is severely limited.

Associational Risk

4

Wayne Huizenga, founder of Waste Management, was a major contributor to Republican causes and has also given gifts to the controversial Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas. Having passed away, his political activities likely do not pose risks. Additionally, an employee PAC for WM contributed money to the fund of Republican Senator Eric Nesbitt who was under scrutiny in 2022 for stalling the passing of new Michigan legislation to modernization their waste management and recycling systems. Further, the company has made contributions to controversial figure Donald Trump.

Brand Visibility Risk

1

Nobody really wants to think about where their trash goes, and despite people paying more attention to sustainability, they generally don't think about their utilities outside of when bills are due. Additionally, there are generally few options for switching away from a trash company.

Political Hazard (pH) Ratings Explained

A corporation’s Political Hazard Rating, or pH rating, is an overall assessment of the corporation’s likelihood of facing a material consumer boycott or investor backlash from a controversy caused by the company’s or its executives’ political activities and proclivities. The pH ratings range from 1 to 5, with a higher rating correlating with higher risk. The categories below are the components considered when setting a company’s pH rating.

Public Statements Risk

Rates the corporation based on its executives’ and the corporations’ own prior public political statements, including their frequency and whether they have tended to be, or actually have been, controversial or high-profile.

Political Dichotomy Risk

Rates the corporation based on the dichotomy, if any, between the executives’ and/or corporations’ own prior political contributions or statements and the likely political leaning of the corporation’s consumer base.

Political Contributions Risk

Rates the corporation based on the magnitude of the executives’ and/or corporations’ total political contributions to politicians and PACs, benchmarked to sector, and the weighted nature of those contributions as between political parties.

Associational Risk

Rates the corporation based on its executives’ and/or the corporation’s own prior political contributions and/or public association with particularly controversial people or high-profile politicians or PACs.

Brand Visibility Risk

Rates the corporation's risk relative to sector with higher risk being associated with higher brand visibility

See this company on INDEXALIGN

Read the reports of these top S&P 500 companies

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

AB InBev

AT&T

Adobe

Advance Auto Parts

Alphabet

Amazon

American Express

Apple

AutoZone

Bath & Body Works

Best Buy

Biogen

Brown Forman

CVS

Caesar's

Campbell

CarMax

Carnival

Charter

Chipotle

Clorox

Coke

Colgate Palmolive

Comcast

Constellation Brands

Costco

Digital Realty

Disney

Dollar General

Dollar Tree

Domino's

EA

Equinix

Estee Lauder

Etsy

Expedia

FedEx

First Energy

Ford

Fox

Garmin

General Mills

General Motors

Hasbro

Hershey's

Hilton

Home Depot

Hormel

Intuit

JM Smucker

JP Morgan

Keurig Dr. Pepper

Kraft Heinz

Kroger

Las Vegas Sands

Lowe's

MGM Resorts

Marriott

McCormick

McDonald's

Meta

Microsoft

Moderna

Molson Coors

Monster

Motorola

Netflix

Nike

Norwegian Cruise

Nvidia

Oracle

Paramount

Pepsi

Pfizer

Procter & Gamble

Ralph Lauren

Ross

Royal Caribbean

Salesforce

Starbucks

Sysco

T-Mobile

TJX

Take Two

Tapestry

Target

Tesla

Tyson

UPS

Ulta

United Airlines

VF Corp

Verizon

Walgreens

Walmart

Warner Bros. Discovery

Waste Management

Wynn

Yum!

eBay

“As a political data company, we are uniquely positioned to measure a company’s pH.” Abigail Wuest, CEO