TJX

2.2

Companies list

Public Statements Risk

2

Very few public statements and the CEO keeps a low public profile. The company tries to remain neutral. Their brands have done pride collections and similar, but have not done any groundbreaking or highly controversial campaigns. The website mentions both inclusivity and environmental sustainability in the Corporate Responsibility section.

Political Contributions Risk

3

Donations are all by senior executives as "TJX has a policy against using corporate funds to make contributions to political causes." Contributions by senior executives are 9 to 1 Blue to Red. They rank toward the bottom third of donors in their sector. Apparel industry competitors' donations mainly skew left, and as such, TJX in line with its competitors.

Political Dichotomy Risk

2

TJ Maxx conducts 77% of its business in the United States. TJX Companies target a broad market segment but generally fit the middle to upper-class profile of department store shoppers. The company does not appear to have any history of boycotts. The diversification of the consumer base and moderate partisanship of contributions demonstrates a mild political risk. Despite the low risk profile, the vast majority of TJX customers are consumers, leaving it somewhat vulnerable to boycott.

Associational Risk

2

None of the subsidiaries' social media pages have controversial content. Google searches of executives yields no negative press coverage. Overall, no potentially risky relations found. While donations are lower than competitors, the organization has contributed to controversial figures including Bernie Sanders, Donald Trump, Elizabeth Warren, and Hillary Clinton.

Brand Visibility Risk

2

The do advertise a good deal. Could get into trouble, however, it's unlikely for something innocuous to blow up.

Political Hazard (pH) Ratings Explained

A corporation’s Political Hazard Rating, or pH rating, is an overall assessment of the corporation’s likelihood of facing a material consumer boycott or investor backlash from a controversy caused by the company’s or its executives’ political activities and proclivities. The pH ratings range from 1 to 5, with a higher rating correlating with higher risk. The categories below are the components considered when setting a company’s pH rating.

Public Statements Risk

Rates the corporation based on its executives’ and the corporations’ own prior public political statements, including their frequency and whether they have tended to be, or actually have been, controversial or high-profile.

Political Dichotomy Risk

Rates the corporation based on the dichotomy, if any, between the executives’ and/or corporations’ own prior political contributions or statements and the likely political leaning of the corporation’s consumer base.

Political Contributions Risk

Rates the corporation based on the magnitude of the executives’ and/or corporations’ total political contributions to politicians and PACs, benchmarked to sector, and the weighted nature of those contributions as between political parties.

Associational Risk

Rates the corporation based on its executives’ and/or the corporation’s own prior political contributions and/or public association with particularly controversial people or high-profile politicians or PACs.

Brand Visibility Risk

Rates the corporation's risk relative to sector with higher risk being associated with higher brand visibility

TJX

2.2

Companies list

Public Statements Risk

2

Very few public statements and the CEO keeps a low public profile. The company tries to remain neutral. Their brands have done pride collections and similar, but have not done any groundbreaking or highly controversial campaigns. The website mentions both inclusivity and environmental sustainability in the Corporate Responsibility section.

Political Contributions Risk

3

Donations are all by senior executives as "TJX has a policy against using corporate funds to make contributions to political causes." Contributions by senior executives are 9 to 1 Blue to Red. They rank toward the bottom third of donors in their sector. Apparel industry competitors' donations mainly skew left, and as such, TJX in line with its competitors.

Political Dichotomy Risk

2

TJ Maxx conducts 77% of its business in the United States. TJX Companies target a broad market segment but generally fit the middle to upper-class profile of department store shoppers. The company does not appear to have any history of boycotts. The diversification of the consumer base and moderate partisanship of contributions demonstrates a mild political risk. Despite the low risk profile, the vast majority of TJX customers are consumers, leaving it somewhat vulnerable to boycott.

Associational Risk

2

None of the subsidiaries' social media pages have controversial content. Google searches of executives yields no negative press coverage. Overall, no potentially risky relations found. While donations are lower than competitors, the organization has contributed to controversial figures including Bernie Sanders, Donald Trump, Elizabeth Warren, and Hillary Clinton.

Brand Visibility Risk

2

The do advertise a good deal. Could get into trouble, however, it's unlikely for something innocuous to blow up.

Political Hazard (pH) Ratings Explained

A corporation’s Political Hazard Rating, or pH rating, is an overall assessment of the corporation’s likelihood of facing a material consumer boycott or investor backlash from a controversy caused by the company’s or its executives’ political activities and proclivities. The pH ratings range from 1 to 5, with a higher rating correlating with higher risk. The categories below are the components considered when setting a company’s pH rating.

Public Statements Risk

Rates the corporation based on its executives’ and the corporations’ own prior public political statements, including their frequency and whether they have tended to be, or actually have been, controversial or high-profile.

Political Dichotomy Risk

Rates the corporation based on the dichotomy, if any, between the executives’ and/or corporations’ own prior political contributions or statements and the likely political leaning of the corporation’s consumer base.

Political Contributions Risk

Rates the corporation based on the magnitude of the executives’ and/or corporations’ total political contributions to politicians and PACs, benchmarked to sector, and the weighted nature of those contributions as between political parties.

Associational Risk

Rates the corporation based on its executives’ and/or the corporation’s own prior political contributions and/or public association with particularly controversial people or high-profile politicians or PACs.

Brand Visibility Risk

Rates the corporation's risk relative to sector with higher risk being associated with higher brand visibility

TJX

2.2

Companies list

Public Statements Risk

2

Very few public statements and the CEO keeps a low public profile. The company tries to remain neutral. Their brands have done pride collections and similar, but have not done any groundbreaking or highly controversial campaigns. The website mentions both inclusivity and environmental sustainability in the Corporate Responsibility section.

Political Contributions Risk

3

Donations are all by senior executives as "TJX has a policy against using corporate funds to make contributions to political causes." Contributions by senior executives are 9 to 1 Blue to Red. They rank toward the bottom third of donors in their sector. Apparel industry competitors' donations mainly skew left, and as such, TJX in line with its competitors.

Political Dichotomy Risk

2

TJ Maxx conducts 77% of its business in the United States. TJX Companies target a broad market segment but generally fit the middle to upper-class profile of department store shoppers. The company does not appear to have any history of boycotts. The diversification of the consumer base and moderate partisanship of contributions demonstrates a mild political risk. Despite the low risk profile, the vast majority of TJX customers are consumers, leaving it somewhat vulnerable to boycott.

Associational Risk

2

None of the subsidiaries' social media pages have controversial content. Google searches of executives yields no negative press coverage. Overall, no potentially risky relations found. While donations are lower than competitors, the organization has contributed to controversial figures including Bernie Sanders, Donald Trump, Elizabeth Warren, and Hillary Clinton.

Brand Visibility Risk

2

The do advertise a good deal. Could get into trouble, however, it's unlikely for something innocuous to blow up.

Political Hazard (pH) Ratings Explained

A corporation’s Political Hazard Rating, or pH rating, is an overall assessment of the corporation’s likelihood of facing a material consumer boycott or investor backlash from a controversy caused by the company’s or its executives’ political activities and proclivities. The pH ratings range from 1 to 5, with a higher rating correlating with higher risk. The categories below are the components considered when setting a company’s pH rating.

Public Statements Risk

Rates the corporation based on its executives’ and the corporations’ own prior public political statements, including their frequency and whether they have tended to be, or actually have been, controversial or high-profile.

Political Dichotomy Risk

Rates the corporation based on the dichotomy, if any, between the executives’ and/or corporations’ own prior political contributions or statements and the likely political leaning of the corporation’s consumer base.

Political Contributions Risk

Rates the corporation based on the magnitude of the executives’ and/or corporations’ total political contributions to politicians and PACs, benchmarked to sector, and the weighted nature of those contributions as between political parties.

Associational Risk

Rates the corporation based on its executives’ and/or the corporation’s own prior political contributions and/or public association with particularly controversial people or high-profile politicians or PACs.

Brand Visibility Risk

Rates the corporation's risk relative to sector with higher risk being associated with higher brand visibility

TJX

2.2

Companies list

Public Statements Risk

2

Very few public statements and the CEO keeps a low public profile. The company tries to remain neutral. Their brands have done pride collections and similar, but have not done any groundbreaking or highly controversial campaigns. The website mentions both inclusivity and environmental sustainability in the Corporate Responsibility section.

Political Contributions Risk

3

Donations are all by senior executives as "TJX has a policy against using corporate funds to make contributions to political causes." Contributions by senior executives are 9 to 1 Blue to Red. They rank toward the bottom third of donors in their sector. Apparel industry competitors' donations mainly skew left, and as such, TJX in line with its competitors.

Political Dichotomy Risk

2

TJ Maxx conducts 77% of its business in the United States. TJX Companies target a broad market segment but generally fit the middle to upper-class profile of department store shoppers. The company does not appear to have any history of boycotts. The diversification of the consumer base and moderate partisanship of contributions demonstrates a mild political risk. Despite the low risk profile, the vast majority of TJX customers are consumers, leaving it somewhat vulnerable to boycott.

Associational Risk

2

None of the subsidiaries' social media pages have controversial content. Google searches of executives yields no negative press coverage. Overall, no potentially risky relations found. While donations are lower than competitors, the organization has contributed to controversial figures including Bernie Sanders, Donald Trump, Elizabeth Warren, and Hillary Clinton.

Brand Visibility Risk

2

The do advertise a good deal. Could get into trouble, however, it's unlikely for something innocuous to blow up.

Political Hazard (pH) Ratings Explained

A corporation’s Political Hazard Rating, or pH rating, is an overall assessment of the corporation’s likelihood of facing a material consumer boycott or investor backlash from a controversy caused by the company’s or its executives’ political activities and proclivities. The pH ratings range from 1 to 5, with a higher rating correlating with higher risk. The categories below are the components considered when setting a company’s pH rating.

Public Statements Risk

Rates the corporation based on its executives’ and the corporations’ own prior public political statements, including their frequency and whether they have tended to be, or actually have been, controversial or high-profile.

Political Dichotomy Risk

Rates the corporation based on the dichotomy, if any, between the executives’ and/or corporations’ own prior political contributions or statements and the likely political leaning of the corporation’s consumer base.

Political Contributions Risk

Rates the corporation based on the magnitude of the executives’ and/or corporations’ total political contributions to politicians and PACs, benchmarked to sector, and the weighted nature of those contributions as between political parties.

Associational Risk

Rates the corporation based on its executives’ and/or the corporation’s own prior political contributions and/or public association with particularly controversial people or high-profile politicians or PACs.

Brand Visibility Risk

Rates the corporation's risk relative to sector with higher risk being associated with higher brand visibility

TJX

2.2

Companies list

Public Statements Risk

2

Very few public statements and the CEO keeps a low public profile. The company tries to remain neutral. Their brands have done pride collections and similar, but have not done any groundbreaking or highly controversial campaigns. The website mentions both inclusivity and environmental sustainability in the Corporate Responsibility section.

Political Contributions Risk

3

Donations are all by senior executives as "TJX has a policy against using corporate funds to make contributions to political causes." Contributions by senior executives are 9 to 1 Blue to Red. They rank toward the bottom third of donors in their sector. Apparel industry competitors' donations mainly skew left, and as such, TJX in line with its competitors.

Political Dichotomy Risk

2

TJ Maxx conducts 77% of its business in the United States. TJX Companies target a broad market segment but generally fit the middle to upper-class profile of department store shoppers. The company does not appear to have any history of boycotts. The diversification of the consumer base and moderate partisanship of contributions demonstrates a mild political risk. Despite the low risk profile, the vast majority of TJX customers are consumers, leaving it somewhat vulnerable to boycott.

Associational Risk

2

None of the subsidiaries' social media pages have controversial content. Google searches of executives yields no negative press coverage. Overall, no potentially risky relations found. While donations are lower than competitors, the organization has contributed to controversial figures including Bernie Sanders, Donald Trump, Elizabeth Warren, and Hillary Clinton.

Brand Visibility Risk

2

The do advertise a good deal. Could get into trouble, however, it's unlikely for something innocuous to blow up.

Political Hazard (pH) Ratings Explained

A corporation’s Political Hazard Rating, or pH rating, is an overall assessment of the corporation’s likelihood of facing a material consumer boycott or investor backlash from a controversy caused by the company’s or its executives’ political activities and proclivities. The pH ratings range from 1 to 5, with a higher rating correlating with higher risk. The categories below are the components considered when setting a company’s pH rating.

Public Statements Risk

Rates the corporation based on its executives’ and the corporations’ own prior public political statements, including their frequency and whether they have tended to be, or actually have been, controversial or high-profile.

Political Dichotomy Risk

Rates the corporation based on the dichotomy, if any, between the executives’ and/or corporations’ own prior political contributions or statements and the likely political leaning of the corporation’s consumer base.

Political Contributions Risk

Rates the corporation based on the magnitude of the executives’ and/or corporations’ total political contributions to politicians and PACs, benchmarked to sector, and the weighted nature of those contributions as between political parties.

Associational Risk

Rates the corporation based on its executives’ and/or the corporation’s own prior political contributions and/or public association with particularly controversial people or high-profile politicians or PACs.

Brand Visibility Risk

Rates the corporation's risk relative to sector with higher risk being associated with higher brand visibility

TJX

Public Statements Risk

Political Contributions Risk

Political Dichotomy Risk

Associational Risk

Brand Visibility Risk

Political Hazard (pH) Ratings Explained

Public Statements Risk

Political Dichotomy Risk

Political Contributions Risk

Associational Risk

Brand Visibility Risk

TJX

Public Statements Risk

Political Contributions Risk

Political Dichotomy Risk

Associational Risk

Brand Visibility Risk

Political Hazard (pH) Ratings Explained

Public Statements Risk

Political Dichotomy Risk

Political Contributions Risk

Associational Risk

Brand Visibility Risk

TJX

Public Statements Risk

Political Contributions Risk

Political Dichotomy Risk

Associational Risk

Brand Visibility Risk

Political Hazard (pH) Ratings Explained

Public Statements Risk

Political Dichotomy Risk

Political Contributions Risk

Associational Risk

Brand Visibility Risk

TJX

Public Statements Risk

Political Contributions Risk

Political Dichotomy Risk

Associational Risk

Brand Visibility Risk

Political Hazard (pH) Ratings Explained

Public Statements Risk

Political Dichotomy Risk

Political Contributions Risk

Associational Risk

Brand Visibility Risk

TJX

Public Statements Risk

Political Contributions Risk

Political Dichotomy Risk

Associational Risk

Brand Visibility Risk

Political Hazard (pH) Ratings Explained

Public Statements Risk

Political Dichotomy Risk

Political Contributions Risk

Associational Risk

Brand Visibility Risk

See this company on INDEXALIGN

Read the reports of these top S&P 500 companies

AB InBev

AT&T

Adobe

Advance Auto Parts

Alphabet

Amazon

American Express

Apple

AutoZone

Bath & Body Works

Best Buy

Biogen

Brown Forman

CVS

Caesar's

Campbell

CarMax

Carnival