Caesar's

CZR
1.8
Companies list

Public Statements Risk

2

Thomas Reeg is the CEO of Caesars Entertainment. He stays out of the public eye in terms of interviews, articles, and social media. The company's most recent controversies were a class action lawsuit over price collusion with other casinos and a culinary union strike in 2023. The company has a minimally active social media presence, limited to X, Youtube, and a blank Facebook page. The brand's site briefly mentions a concern for the environment.

Political Contributions Risk

3

Caesar's Palace donates with a significant Blue skew through the company PAC, accounting for the majority of funds. The company's combined contribution level is high but ranks at the upper-middle threshold of the Consumer Discretionary sector, donating substantially less than close competitors MGM and WYNN. Sector partisanship varies broadly but Caesar's is typical of industry trends. The company has contributed to controversial political figure Hillary Clinton. Its risk is augmented by partisanship but mitigated by sector benchmarking and comparison to close competitors.

Political Dichotomy Risk

1

Caesar's Entertainment has a mixed customer base due to the nature of their business, which involves having consumers from all over the country and world with varying political affiliations. Additionally, Caesar's Entertainment donates less than its competitors, though skews in favor of Democrats. Due to these conditions, Caesar's Entertainment has a low political dichotomy risk due to the lack of public statements and lack of partisan social media campaigns.

Associational Risk

1

There is very little news about the company's political orientation. Additionally, there is no press covering controversy surrounding the CEO or management. Social media only shows relations with famous celebrities such as Gordon Ramsey, which are generally uncontentious.

Brand Visibility Risk

3

In nearly the same situation as MGM Resorts, but more diversified across the US and with less brand-centric offerings. It has a similar risk profile.

Political Hazard (pH) Ratings Explained

A corporation’s Political Hazard Rating, or pH rating, is an overall assessment of the corporation’s likelihood of facing a material consumer boycott or investor backlash from a controversy caused by the company’s or its executives’ political activities and proclivities. The pH ratings range from 1 to 5, with a higher rating correlating with higher risk. The categories below are the components considered when setting a company’s pH rating.

Public Statements Risk

Rates the corporation based on its executives’ and the corporations’ own prior public political statements, including their frequency and whether they have tended to be, or actually have been, controversial or high-profile.

Political Dichotomy Risk

Rates the corporation based on the dichotomy, if any, between the executives’ and/or corporations’ own prior political contributions or statements and the likely political leaning of the corporation’s consumer base.

Political Contributions Risk

Rates the corporation based on the magnitude of the executives’ and/or corporations’ total political contributions to politicians and PACs, benchmarked to sector, and the weighted nature of those contributions as between political parties.

Associational Risk

Rates the corporation based on its executives’ and/or the corporation’s own prior political contributions and/or public association with particularly controversial people or high-profile politicians or PACs.

Brand Visibility Risk

Rates the corporation's risk relative to sector with higher risk being associated with higher brand visibility

Caesar's

CZR
1.8
Companies list

Public Statements Risk

2

Thomas Reeg is the CEO of Caesars Entertainment. He stays out of the public eye in terms of interviews, articles, and social media. The company's most recent controversies were a class action lawsuit over price collusion with other casinos and a culinary union strike in 2023. The company has a minimally active social media presence, limited to X, Youtube, and a blank Facebook page. The brand's site briefly mentions a concern for the environment.

Political Contributions Risk

3

Caesar's Palace donates with a significant Blue skew through the company PAC, accounting for the majority of funds. The company's combined contribution level is high but ranks at the upper-middle threshold of the Consumer Discretionary sector, donating substantially less than close competitors MGM and WYNN. Sector partisanship varies broadly but Caesar's is typical of industry trends. The company has contributed to controversial political figure Hillary Clinton. Its risk is augmented by partisanship but mitigated by sector benchmarking and comparison to close competitors.

Political Dichotomy Risk

1

Caesar's Entertainment has a mixed customer base due to the nature of their business, which involves having consumers from all over the country and world with varying political affiliations. Additionally, Caesar's Entertainment donates less than its competitors, though skews in favor of Democrats. Due to these conditions, Caesar's Entertainment has a low political dichotomy risk due to the lack of public statements and lack of partisan social media campaigns.

Associational Risk

1

There is very little news about the company's political orientation. Additionally, there is no press covering controversy surrounding the CEO or management. Social media only shows relations with famous celebrities such as Gordon Ramsey, which are generally uncontentious.

Brand Visibility Risk

3

In nearly the same situation as MGM Resorts, but more diversified across the US and with less brand-centric offerings. It has a similar risk profile.

Political Hazard (pH) Ratings Explained

A corporation’s Political Hazard Rating, or pH rating, is an overall assessment of the corporation’s likelihood of facing a material consumer boycott or investor backlash from a controversy caused by the company’s or its executives’ political activities and proclivities. The pH ratings range from 1 to 5, with a higher rating correlating with higher risk. The categories below are the components considered when setting a company’s pH rating.

Public Statements Risk

Rates the corporation based on its executives’ and the corporations’ own prior public political statements, including their frequency and whether they have tended to be, or actually have been, controversial or high-profile.

Political Dichotomy Risk

Rates the corporation based on the dichotomy, if any, between the executives’ and/or corporations’ own prior political contributions or statements and the likely political leaning of the corporation’s consumer base.

Political Contributions Risk

Rates the corporation based on the magnitude of the executives’ and/or corporations’ total political contributions to politicians and PACs, benchmarked to sector, and the weighted nature of those contributions as between political parties.

Associational Risk

Rates the corporation based on its executives’ and/or the corporation’s own prior political contributions and/or public association with particularly controversial people or high-profile politicians or PACs.

Brand Visibility Risk

Rates the corporation's risk relative to sector with higher risk being associated with higher brand visibility

Caesar's

CZR
1.8
Companies list

Public Statements Risk

2

Thomas Reeg is the CEO of Caesars Entertainment. He stays out of the public eye in terms of interviews, articles, and social media. The company's most recent controversies were a class action lawsuit over price collusion with other casinos and a culinary union strike in 2023. The company has a minimally active social media presence, limited to X, Youtube, and a blank Facebook page. The brand's site briefly mentions a concern for the environment.

Political Contributions Risk

3

Caesar's Palace donates with a significant Blue skew through the company PAC, accounting for the majority of funds. The company's combined contribution level is high but ranks at the upper-middle threshold of the Consumer Discretionary sector, donating substantially less than close competitors MGM and WYNN. Sector partisanship varies broadly but Caesar's is typical of industry trends. The company has contributed to controversial political figure Hillary Clinton. Its risk is augmented by partisanship but mitigated by sector benchmarking and comparison to close competitors.

Political Dichotomy Risk

1

Caesar's Entertainment has a mixed customer base due to the nature of their business, which involves having consumers from all over the country and world with varying political affiliations. Additionally, Caesar's Entertainment donates less than its competitors, though skews in favor of Democrats. Due to these conditions, Caesar's Entertainment has a low political dichotomy risk due to the lack of public statements and lack of partisan social media campaigns.

Associational Risk

1

There is very little news about the company's political orientation. Additionally, there is no press covering controversy surrounding the CEO or management. Social media only shows relations with famous celebrities such as Gordon Ramsey, which are generally uncontentious.

Brand Visibility Risk

3

In nearly the same situation as MGM Resorts, but more diversified across the US and with less brand-centric offerings. It has a similar risk profile.

Political Hazard (pH) Ratings Explained

A corporation’s Political Hazard Rating, or pH rating, is an overall assessment of the corporation’s likelihood of facing a material consumer boycott or investor backlash from a controversy caused by the company’s or its executives’ political activities and proclivities. The pH ratings range from 1 to 5, with a higher rating correlating with higher risk. The categories below are the components considered when setting a company’s pH rating.

Public Statements Risk

Rates the corporation based on its executives’ and the corporations’ own prior public political statements, including their frequency and whether they have tended to be, or actually have been, controversial or high-profile.

Political Dichotomy Risk

Rates the corporation based on the dichotomy, if any, between the executives’ and/or corporations’ own prior political contributions or statements and the likely political leaning of the corporation’s consumer base.

Political Contributions Risk

Rates the corporation based on the magnitude of the executives’ and/or corporations’ total political contributions to politicians and PACs, benchmarked to sector, and the weighted nature of those contributions as between political parties.

Associational Risk

Rates the corporation based on its executives’ and/or the corporation’s own prior political contributions and/or public association with particularly controversial people or high-profile politicians or PACs.

Brand Visibility Risk

Rates the corporation's risk relative to sector with higher risk being associated with higher brand visibility

Caesar's

CZR
1.8
Companies list

Public Statements Risk

2

Thomas Reeg is the CEO of Caesars Entertainment. He stays out of the public eye in terms of interviews, articles, and social media. The company's most recent controversies were a class action lawsuit over price collusion with other casinos and a culinary union strike in 2023. The company has a minimally active social media presence, limited to X, Youtube, and a blank Facebook page. The brand's site briefly mentions a concern for the environment.

Political Contributions Risk

3

Caesar's Palace donates with a significant Blue skew through the company PAC, accounting for the majority of funds. The company's combined contribution level is high but ranks at the upper-middle threshold of the Consumer Discretionary sector, donating substantially less than close competitors MGM and WYNN. Sector partisanship varies broadly but Caesar's is typical of industry trends. The company has contributed to controversial political figure Hillary Clinton. Its risk is augmented by partisanship but mitigated by sector benchmarking and comparison to close competitors.

Political Dichotomy Risk

1

Caesar's Entertainment has a mixed customer base due to the nature of their business, which involves having consumers from all over the country and world with varying political affiliations. Additionally, Caesar's Entertainment donates less than its competitors, though skews in favor of Democrats. Due to these conditions, Caesar's Entertainment has a low political dichotomy risk due to the lack of public statements and lack of partisan social media campaigns.

Associational Risk

1

There is very little news about the company's political orientation. Additionally, there is no press covering controversy surrounding the CEO or management. Social media only shows relations with famous celebrities such as Gordon Ramsey, which are generally uncontentious.

Brand Visibility Risk

3

In nearly the same situation as MGM Resorts, but more diversified across the US and with less brand-centric offerings. It has a similar risk profile.

Political Hazard (pH) Ratings Explained

A corporation’s Political Hazard Rating, or pH rating, is an overall assessment of the corporation’s likelihood of facing a material consumer boycott or investor backlash from a controversy caused by the company’s or its executives’ political activities and proclivities. The pH ratings range from 1 to 5, with a higher rating correlating with higher risk. The categories below are the components considered when setting a company’s pH rating.

Public Statements Risk

Rates the corporation based on its executives’ and the corporations’ own prior public political statements, including their frequency and whether they have tended to be, or actually have been, controversial or high-profile.

Political Dichotomy Risk

Rates the corporation based on the dichotomy, if any, between the executives’ and/or corporations’ own prior political contributions or statements and the likely political leaning of the corporation’s consumer base.

Political Contributions Risk

Rates the corporation based on the magnitude of the executives’ and/or corporations’ total political contributions to politicians and PACs, benchmarked to sector, and the weighted nature of those contributions as between political parties.

Associational Risk

Rates the corporation based on its executives’ and/or the corporation’s own prior political contributions and/or public association with particularly controversial people or high-profile politicians or PACs.

Brand Visibility Risk

Rates the corporation's risk relative to sector with higher risk being associated with higher brand visibility

Caesar's

CZR
1.8
Companies list

Public Statements Risk

2

Thomas Reeg is the CEO of Caesars Entertainment. He stays out of the public eye in terms of interviews, articles, and social media. The company's most recent controversies were a class action lawsuit over price collusion with other casinos and a culinary union strike in 2023. The company has a minimally active social media presence, limited to X, Youtube, and a blank Facebook page. The brand's site briefly mentions a concern for the environment.

Political Contributions Risk

3

Caesar's Palace donates with a significant Blue skew through the company PAC, accounting for the majority of funds. The company's combined contribution level is high but ranks at the upper-middle threshold of the Consumer Discretionary sector, donating substantially less than close competitors MGM and WYNN. Sector partisanship varies broadly but Caesar's is typical of industry trends. The company has contributed to controversial political figure Hillary Clinton. Its risk is augmented by partisanship but mitigated by sector benchmarking and comparison to close competitors.

Political Dichotomy Risk

1

Caesar's Entertainment has a mixed customer base due to the nature of their business, which involves having consumers from all over the country and world with varying political affiliations. Additionally, Caesar's Entertainment donates less than its competitors, though skews in favor of Democrats. Due to these conditions, Caesar's Entertainment has a low political dichotomy risk due to the lack of public statements and lack of partisan social media campaigns.

Associational Risk

1

There is very little news about the company's political orientation. Additionally, there is no press covering controversy surrounding the CEO or management. Social media only shows relations with famous celebrities such as Gordon Ramsey, which are generally uncontentious.

Brand Visibility Risk

3

In nearly the same situation as MGM Resorts, but more diversified across the US and with less brand-centric offerings. It has a similar risk profile.

Political Hazard (pH) Ratings Explained

A corporation’s Political Hazard Rating, or pH rating, is an overall assessment of the corporation’s likelihood of facing a material consumer boycott or investor backlash from a controversy caused by the company’s or its executives’ political activities and proclivities. The pH ratings range from 1 to 5, with a higher rating correlating with higher risk. The categories below are the components considered when setting a company’s pH rating.

Public Statements Risk

Rates the corporation based on its executives’ and the corporations’ own prior public political statements, including their frequency and whether they have tended to be, or actually have been, controversial or high-profile.

Political Dichotomy Risk

Rates the corporation based on the dichotomy, if any, between the executives’ and/or corporations’ own prior political contributions or statements and the likely political leaning of the corporation’s consumer base.

Political Contributions Risk

Rates the corporation based on the magnitude of the executives’ and/or corporations’ total political contributions to politicians and PACs, benchmarked to sector, and the weighted nature of those contributions as between political parties.

Associational Risk

Rates the corporation based on its executives’ and/or the corporation’s own prior political contributions and/or public association with particularly controversial people or high-profile politicians or PACs.

Brand Visibility Risk

Rates the corporation's risk relative to sector with higher risk being associated with higher brand visibility

See this company on INDEXALIGN

Read the reports of these top S&P 500 companies

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

AB InBev

AT&T

Adobe

Advance Auto Parts

Alphabet

Amazon

American Express

Apple

AutoZone

Bath & Body Works

Best Buy

Biogen

Brown Forman

CVS

Caesar's

Campbell

CarMax

Carnival

Charter

Chipotle

Clorox

Coke

Colgate Palmolive

Comcast

Constellation Brands

Costco

Digital Realty

Disney

Dollar General

Dollar Tree

Domino's

EA

Equinix

Estee Lauder

Etsy

Expedia

FedEx

First Energy

Ford

Fox

Garmin

General Mills

General Motors

Hasbro

Hershey's

Hilton

Home Depot

Hormel

Intuit

JM Smucker

JP Morgan

Keurig Dr. Pepper

Kraft Heinz

Kroger

Las Vegas Sands

Lowe's

MGM Resorts

Marriott

McCormick

McDonald's

Meta

Microsoft

Moderna

Molson Coors

Monster

Motorola

Netflix

Nike

Norwegian Cruise

Nvidia

Oracle

Paramount

Pepsi

Pfizer

Procter & Gamble

Ralph Lauren

Ross

Royal Caribbean

Salesforce

Starbucks

Sysco

T-Mobile

TJX

Take Two

Tapestry

Target

Tesla

Tyson

UPS

Ulta

United Airlines

VF Corp

Verizon

Walgreens

Walmart

Warner Bros. Discovery

Waste Management

Wynn

Yum!

eBay

“As a political data company, we are uniquely positioned to measure a company’s pH.” Abigail Wuest, CEO