Nvidia

NVDA
1.7
Companies list

Public Statements Risk

3

Jensen Huang has a small social media footprint and his company is the most recent to enter the spotlight. As someone born in Taiwan and working in AI, he will be increasingly visible in the years to come. Nvidia's website mentions DEI and features LGBTQ+ subsections. There are also mentions of sustainability in the corporate overview section, and two separate links to the corporate social responsibility section, which discuss the social impact of AI.

Political Contributions Risk

2

Nvidia is a low-medium sized political contributor in the computers/technology sector and highly favors Democrats, which is typical of the sector.

Political Dichotomy Risk

1

Nvidia leans Democratic, as does most of its customer base. Nvidia's revenue is split roughly evenly between computing/networking and graphics. Nvidia's products are used for mining bitcoin and in PCs for gaming, which opens them up to some boycotts, but as a largely B2B operation, they only really have China to worry about.

Associational Risk

1

No news articles associating Nvidia with anyone, except Elon Musk - but only for business relations. Social media research revealed no sponsorships or anything with celebrities, politicians, or PACs.

Brand Visibility Risk

2

High search volume, but as a product-focused tech company it is generally less exposed to risk. The brand is quite well-regarded, and the company has very few rival products when it comes to developing new technologies. The recognizability of the brand does increase the risk.

Political Hazard (pH) Ratings Explained

A corporation’s Political Hazard Rating, or pH rating, is an overall assessment of the corporation’s likelihood of facing a material consumer boycott or investor backlash from a controversy caused by the company’s or its executives’ political activities and proclivities. The pH ratings range from 1 to 5, with a higher rating correlating with higher risk. The categories below are the components considered when setting a company’s pH rating.

Public Statements Risk

Rates the corporation based on its executives’ and the corporations’ own prior public political statements, including their frequency and whether they have tended to be, or actually have been, controversial or high-profile.

Political Dichotomy Risk

Rates the corporation based on the dichotomy, if any, between the executives’ and/or corporations’ own prior political contributions or statements and the likely political leaning of the corporation’s consumer base.

Political Contributions Risk

Rates the corporation based on the magnitude of the executives’ and/or corporations’ total political contributions to politicians and PACs, benchmarked to sector, and the weighted nature of those contributions as between political parties.

Associational Risk

Rates the corporation based on its executives’ and/or the corporation’s own prior political contributions and/or public association with particularly controversial people or high-profile politicians or PACs.

Brand Visibility Risk

Rates the corporation's risk relative to sector with higher risk being associated with higher brand visibility

Nvidia

NVDA
1.7
Companies list

Public Statements Risk

3

Jensen Huang has a small social media footprint and his company is the most recent to enter the spotlight. As someone born in Taiwan and working in AI, he will be increasingly visible in the years to come. Nvidia's website mentions DEI and features LGBTQ+ subsections. There are also mentions of sustainability in the corporate overview section, and two separate links to the corporate social responsibility section, which discuss the social impact of AI.

Political Contributions Risk

2

Nvidia is a low-medium sized political contributor in the computers/technology sector and highly favors Democrats, which is typical of the sector.

Political Dichotomy Risk

1

Nvidia leans Democratic, as does most of its customer base. Nvidia's revenue is split roughly evenly between computing/networking and graphics. Nvidia's products are used for mining bitcoin and in PCs for gaming, which opens them up to some boycotts, but as a largely B2B operation, they only really have China to worry about.

Associational Risk

1

No news articles associating Nvidia with anyone, except Elon Musk - but only for business relations. Social media research revealed no sponsorships or anything with celebrities, politicians, or PACs.

Brand Visibility Risk

2

High search volume, but as a product-focused tech company it is generally less exposed to risk. The brand is quite well-regarded, and the company has very few rival products when it comes to developing new technologies. The recognizability of the brand does increase the risk.

Political Hazard (pH) Ratings Explained

A corporation’s Political Hazard Rating, or pH rating, is an overall assessment of the corporation’s likelihood of facing a material consumer boycott or investor backlash from a controversy caused by the company’s or its executives’ political activities and proclivities. The pH ratings range from 1 to 5, with a higher rating correlating with higher risk. The categories below are the components considered when setting a company’s pH rating.

Public Statements Risk

Rates the corporation based on its executives’ and the corporations’ own prior public political statements, including their frequency and whether they have tended to be, or actually have been, controversial or high-profile.

Political Dichotomy Risk

Rates the corporation based on the dichotomy, if any, between the executives’ and/or corporations’ own prior political contributions or statements and the likely political leaning of the corporation’s consumer base.

Political Contributions Risk

Rates the corporation based on the magnitude of the executives’ and/or corporations’ total political contributions to politicians and PACs, benchmarked to sector, and the weighted nature of those contributions as between political parties.

Associational Risk

Rates the corporation based on its executives’ and/or the corporation’s own prior political contributions and/or public association with particularly controversial people or high-profile politicians or PACs.

Brand Visibility Risk

Rates the corporation's risk relative to sector with higher risk being associated with higher brand visibility

Nvidia

NVDA
1.7
Companies list

Public Statements Risk

3

Jensen Huang has a small social media footprint and his company is the most recent to enter the spotlight. As someone born in Taiwan and working in AI, he will be increasingly visible in the years to come. Nvidia's website mentions DEI and features LGBTQ+ subsections. There are also mentions of sustainability in the corporate overview section, and two separate links to the corporate social responsibility section, which discuss the social impact of AI.

Political Contributions Risk

2

Nvidia is a low-medium sized political contributor in the computers/technology sector and highly favors Democrats, which is typical of the sector.

Political Dichotomy Risk

1

Nvidia leans Democratic, as does most of its customer base. Nvidia's revenue is split roughly evenly between computing/networking and graphics. Nvidia's products are used for mining bitcoin and in PCs for gaming, which opens them up to some boycotts, but as a largely B2B operation, they only really have China to worry about.

Associational Risk

1

No news articles associating Nvidia with anyone, except Elon Musk - but only for business relations. Social media research revealed no sponsorships or anything with celebrities, politicians, or PACs.

Brand Visibility Risk

2

High search volume, but as a product-focused tech company it is generally less exposed to risk. The brand is quite well-regarded, and the company has very few rival products when it comes to developing new technologies. The recognizability of the brand does increase the risk.

Political Hazard (pH) Ratings Explained

A corporation’s Political Hazard Rating, or pH rating, is an overall assessment of the corporation’s likelihood of facing a material consumer boycott or investor backlash from a controversy caused by the company’s or its executives’ political activities and proclivities. The pH ratings range from 1 to 5, with a higher rating correlating with higher risk. The categories below are the components considered when setting a company’s pH rating.

Public Statements Risk

Rates the corporation based on its executives’ and the corporations’ own prior public political statements, including their frequency and whether they have tended to be, or actually have been, controversial or high-profile.

Political Dichotomy Risk

Rates the corporation based on the dichotomy, if any, between the executives’ and/or corporations’ own prior political contributions or statements and the likely political leaning of the corporation’s consumer base.

Political Contributions Risk

Rates the corporation based on the magnitude of the executives’ and/or corporations’ total political contributions to politicians and PACs, benchmarked to sector, and the weighted nature of those contributions as between political parties.

Associational Risk

Rates the corporation based on its executives’ and/or the corporation’s own prior political contributions and/or public association with particularly controversial people or high-profile politicians or PACs.

Brand Visibility Risk

Rates the corporation's risk relative to sector with higher risk being associated with higher brand visibility

Nvidia

NVDA
1.7
Companies list

Public Statements Risk

3

Jensen Huang has a small social media footprint and his company is the most recent to enter the spotlight. As someone born in Taiwan and working in AI, he will be increasingly visible in the years to come. Nvidia's website mentions DEI and features LGBTQ+ subsections. There are also mentions of sustainability in the corporate overview section, and two separate links to the corporate social responsibility section, which discuss the social impact of AI.

Political Contributions Risk

2

Nvidia is a low-medium sized political contributor in the computers/technology sector and highly favors Democrats, which is typical of the sector.

Political Dichotomy Risk

1

Nvidia leans Democratic, as does most of its customer base. Nvidia's revenue is split roughly evenly between computing/networking and graphics. Nvidia's products are used for mining bitcoin and in PCs for gaming, which opens them up to some boycotts, but as a largely B2B operation, they only really have China to worry about.

Associational Risk

1

No news articles associating Nvidia with anyone, except Elon Musk - but only for business relations. Social media research revealed no sponsorships or anything with celebrities, politicians, or PACs.

Brand Visibility Risk

2

High search volume, but as a product-focused tech company it is generally less exposed to risk. The brand is quite well-regarded, and the company has very few rival products when it comes to developing new technologies. The recognizability of the brand does increase the risk.

Political Hazard (pH) Ratings Explained

A corporation’s Political Hazard Rating, or pH rating, is an overall assessment of the corporation’s likelihood of facing a material consumer boycott or investor backlash from a controversy caused by the company’s or its executives’ political activities and proclivities. The pH ratings range from 1 to 5, with a higher rating correlating with higher risk. The categories below are the components considered when setting a company’s pH rating.

Public Statements Risk

Rates the corporation based on its executives’ and the corporations’ own prior public political statements, including their frequency and whether they have tended to be, or actually have been, controversial or high-profile.

Political Dichotomy Risk

Rates the corporation based on the dichotomy, if any, between the executives’ and/or corporations’ own prior political contributions or statements and the likely political leaning of the corporation’s consumer base.

Political Contributions Risk

Rates the corporation based on the magnitude of the executives’ and/or corporations’ total political contributions to politicians and PACs, benchmarked to sector, and the weighted nature of those contributions as between political parties.

Associational Risk

Rates the corporation based on its executives’ and/or the corporation’s own prior political contributions and/or public association with particularly controversial people or high-profile politicians or PACs.

Brand Visibility Risk

Rates the corporation's risk relative to sector with higher risk being associated with higher brand visibility

Nvidia

NVDA
1.7
Companies list

Public Statements Risk

3

Jensen Huang has a small social media footprint and his company is the most recent to enter the spotlight. As someone born in Taiwan and working in AI, he will be increasingly visible in the years to come. Nvidia's website mentions DEI and features LGBTQ+ subsections. There are also mentions of sustainability in the corporate overview section, and two separate links to the corporate social responsibility section, which discuss the social impact of AI.

Political Contributions Risk

2

Nvidia is a low-medium sized political contributor in the computers/technology sector and highly favors Democrats, which is typical of the sector.

Political Dichotomy Risk

1

Nvidia leans Democratic, as does most of its customer base. Nvidia's revenue is split roughly evenly between computing/networking and graphics. Nvidia's products are used for mining bitcoin and in PCs for gaming, which opens them up to some boycotts, but as a largely B2B operation, they only really have China to worry about.

Associational Risk

1

No news articles associating Nvidia with anyone, except Elon Musk - but only for business relations. Social media research revealed no sponsorships or anything with celebrities, politicians, or PACs.

Brand Visibility Risk

2

High search volume, but as a product-focused tech company it is generally less exposed to risk. The brand is quite well-regarded, and the company has very few rival products when it comes to developing new technologies. The recognizability of the brand does increase the risk.

Political Hazard (pH) Ratings Explained

A corporation’s Political Hazard Rating, or pH rating, is an overall assessment of the corporation’s likelihood of facing a material consumer boycott or investor backlash from a controversy caused by the company’s or its executives’ political activities and proclivities. The pH ratings range from 1 to 5, with a higher rating correlating with higher risk. The categories below are the components considered when setting a company’s pH rating.

Public Statements Risk

Rates the corporation based on its executives’ and the corporations’ own prior public political statements, including their frequency and whether they have tended to be, or actually have been, controversial or high-profile.

Political Dichotomy Risk

Rates the corporation based on the dichotomy, if any, between the executives’ and/or corporations’ own prior political contributions or statements and the likely political leaning of the corporation’s consumer base.

Political Contributions Risk

Rates the corporation based on the magnitude of the executives’ and/or corporations’ total political contributions to politicians and PACs, benchmarked to sector, and the weighted nature of those contributions as between political parties.

Associational Risk

Rates the corporation based on its executives’ and/or the corporation’s own prior political contributions and/or public association with particularly controversial people or high-profile politicians or PACs.

Brand Visibility Risk

Rates the corporation's risk relative to sector with higher risk being associated with higher brand visibility

See this company on INDEXALIGN

Read the reports of these top S&P 500 companies

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

AB InBev

AT&T

Adobe

Advance Auto Parts

Alphabet

Amazon

American Express

Apple

AutoZone

Bath & Body Works

Best Buy

Biogen

Brown Forman

CVS

Caesar's

Campbell

CarMax

Carnival

Charter

Chipotle

Clorox

Coke

Colgate Palmolive

Comcast

Constellation Brands

Costco

Digital Realty

Disney

Dollar General

Dollar Tree

Domino's

EA

Equinix

Estee Lauder

Etsy

Expedia

FedEx

First Energy

Ford

Fox

Garmin

General Mills

General Motors

Hasbro

Hershey's

Hilton

Home Depot

Hormel

Intuit

JM Smucker

JP Morgan

Keurig Dr. Pepper

Kraft Heinz

Kroger

Las Vegas Sands

Lowe's

MGM Resorts

Marriott

McCormick

McDonald's

Meta

Microsoft

Moderna

Molson Coors

Monster

Motorola

Netflix

Nike

Norwegian Cruise

Nvidia

Oracle

Paramount

Pepsi

Pfizer

Procter & Gamble

Ralph Lauren

Ross

Royal Caribbean

Salesforce

Starbucks

Sysco

T-Mobile

TJX

Take Two

Tapestry

Target

Tesla

Tyson

UPS

Ulta

United Airlines

VF Corp

Verizon

Walgreens

Walmart

Warner Bros. Discovery

Waste Management

Wynn

Yum!

eBay

“As a political data company, we are uniquely positioned to measure a company’s pH.” Abigail Wuest, CEO