Motorola

MSI
3
Companies list

Public Statements Risk

2

Motorola CEO Greg Brown served on President George W. Bush's National Security Telecommunications Advisory committee, where he made policy recommendations regarding communications and network services. He also served on President Barack Obama's Management Advisory Board. The company does not assume stances on political debates. Their site features sections on both DEI and ESG, accessible from the header menu.

Political Contributions Risk

4

Motorola contributes largely to Red causes, and mostly through its PAC. Contribution level is very high and on the higher end of spectrum when benchmarked to the Information Technology Sector. Stronger partisanship is typical of the IT sector but tends to lean Democratic, making Motorola atypical. Motorola contributes to controversial political figures like Mitch McConnell and Steve Scalise. The risk is elevated by both contribution size and partisanship.

Political Dichotomy Risk

3

Motorola has a diverse customer base from its widely-demanded products and primarily operates with B2C model. Combined with the company's high contribution level, skewed in favor of Republicans, Motorola tends to donate to semi-controversial Republican figures. However, the company also avoids controversial media campaigns that could provoke backlash. The sales strategy is largely centered on price, indicating consumers' lacking in disposable income to boycott for substitutes. But, their donation profile makes them stand out in the Blue sea of the tech world, elevating the risk level.

Associational Risk

3

The company has contributed to Mitch McConnell and Steve Scalise. They have also received press over contributions to Governor DeSantis. Research revealed no other controversial associations on social media or other platforms.

Brand Visibility Risk

3

Motorola is a consumer electronics brand, selling based on features and price, though the sector has somewhat high brand loyalty. The company is primarily B2C, with good awareness but low market share, creating a moderate risk level.

Political Hazard (pH) Ratings Explained

A corporation’s Political Hazard Rating, or pH rating, is an overall assessment of the corporation’s likelihood of facing a material consumer boycott or investor backlash from a controversy caused by the company’s or its executives’ political activities and proclivities. The pH ratings range from 1 to 5, with a higher rating correlating with higher risk. The categories below are the components considered when setting a company’s pH rating.

Public Statements Risk

Rates the corporation based on its executives’ and the corporations’ own prior public political statements, including their frequency and whether they have tended to be, or actually have been, controversial or high-profile.

Political Dichotomy Risk

Rates the corporation based on the dichotomy, if any, between the executives’ and/or corporations’ own prior political contributions or statements and the likely political leaning of the corporation’s consumer base.

Political Contributions Risk

Rates the corporation based on the magnitude of the executives’ and/or corporations’ total political contributions to politicians and PACs, benchmarked to sector, and the weighted nature of those contributions as between political parties.

Associational Risk

Rates the corporation based on its executives’ and/or the corporation’s own prior political contributions and/or public association with particularly controversial people or high-profile politicians or PACs.

Brand Visibility Risk

Rates the corporation's risk relative to sector with higher risk being associated with higher brand visibility

Motorola

MSI
3
Companies list

Public Statements Risk

2

Motorola CEO Greg Brown served on President George W. Bush's National Security Telecommunications Advisory committee, where he made policy recommendations regarding communications and network services. He also served on President Barack Obama's Management Advisory Board. The company does not assume stances on political debates. Their site features sections on both DEI and ESG, accessible from the header menu.

Political Contributions Risk

4

Motorola contributes largely to Red causes, and mostly through its PAC. Contribution level is very high and on the higher end of spectrum when benchmarked to the Information Technology Sector. Stronger partisanship is typical of the IT sector but tends to lean Democratic, making Motorola atypical. Motorola contributes to controversial political figures like Mitch McConnell and Steve Scalise. The risk is elevated by both contribution size and partisanship.

Political Dichotomy Risk

3

Motorola has a diverse customer base from its widely-demanded products and primarily operates with B2C model. Combined with the company's high contribution level, skewed in favor of Republicans, Motorola tends to donate to semi-controversial Republican figures. However, the company also avoids controversial media campaigns that could provoke backlash. The sales strategy is largely centered on price, indicating consumers' lacking in disposable income to boycott for substitutes. But, their donation profile makes them stand out in the Blue sea of the tech world, elevating the risk level.

Associational Risk

3

The company has contributed to Mitch McConnell and Steve Scalise. They have also received press over contributions to Governor DeSantis. Research revealed no other controversial associations on social media or other platforms.

Brand Visibility Risk

3

Motorola is a consumer electronics brand, selling based on features and price, though the sector has somewhat high brand loyalty. The company is primarily B2C, with good awareness but low market share, creating a moderate risk level.

Political Hazard (pH) Ratings Explained

A corporation’s Political Hazard Rating, or pH rating, is an overall assessment of the corporation’s likelihood of facing a material consumer boycott or investor backlash from a controversy caused by the company’s or its executives’ political activities and proclivities. The pH ratings range from 1 to 5, with a higher rating correlating with higher risk. The categories below are the components considered when setting a company’s pH rating.

Public Statements Risk

Rates the corporation based on its executives’ and the corporations’ own prior public political statements, including their frequency and whether they have tended to be, or actually have been, controversial or high-profile.

Political Dichotomy Risk

Rates the corporation based on the dichotomy, if any, between the executives’ and/or corporations’ own prior political contributions or statements and the likely political leaning of the corporation’s consumer base.

Political Contributions Risk

Rates the corporation based on the magnitude of the executives’ and/or corporations’ total political contributions to politicians and PACs, benchmarked to sector, and the weighted nature of those contributions as between political parties.

Associational Risk

Rates the corporation based on its executives’ and/or the corporation’s own prior political contributions and/or public association with particularly controversial people or high-profile politicians or PACs.

Brand Visibility Risk

Rates the corporation's risk relative to sector with higher risk being associated with higher brand visibility

Motorola

MSI
3
Companies list

Public Statements Risk

2

Motorola CEO Greg Brown served on President George W. Bush's National Security Telecommunications Advisory committee, where he made policy recommendations regarding communications and network services. He also served on President Barack Obama's Management Advisory Board. The company does not assume stances on political debates. Their site features sections on both DEI and ESG, accessible from the header menu.

Political Contributions Risk

4

Motorola contributes largely to Red causes, and mostly through its PAC. Contribution level is very high and on the higher end of spectrum when benchmarked to the Information Technology Sector. Stronger partisanship is typical of the IT sector but tends to lean Democratic, making Motorola atypical. Motorola contributes to controversial political figures like Mitch McConnell and Steve Scalise. The risk is elevated by both contribution size and partisanship.

Political Dichotomy Risk

3

Motorola has a diverse customer base from its widely-demanded products and primarily operates with B2C model. Combined with the company's high contribution level, skewed in favor of Republicans, Motorola tends to donate to semi-controversial Republican figures. However, the company also avoids controversial media campaigns that could provoke backlash. The sales strategy is largely centered on price, indicating consumers' lacking in disposable income to boycott for substitutes. But, their donation profile makes them stand out in the Blue sea of the tech world, elevating the risk level.

Associational Risk

3

The company has contributed to Mitch McConnell and Steve Scalise. They have also received press over contributions to Governor DeSantis. Research revealed no other controversial associations on social media or other platforms.

Brand Visibility Risk

3

Motorola is a consumer electronics brand, selling based on features and price, though the sector has somewhat high brand loyalty. The company is primarily B2C, with good awareness but low market share, creating a moderate risk level.

Political Hazard (pH) Ratings Explained

A corporation’s Political Hazard Rating, or pH rating, is an overall assessment of the corporation’s likelihood of facing a material consumer boycott or investor backlash from a controversy caused by the company’s or its executives’ political activities and proclivities. The pH ratings range from 1 to 5, with a higher rating correlating with higher risk. The categories below are the components considered when setting a company’s pH rating.

Public Statements Risk

Rates the corporation based on its executives’ and the corporations’ own prior public political statements, including their frequency and whether they have tended to be, or actually have been, controversial or high-profile.

Political Dichotomy Risk

Rates the corporation based on the dichotomy, if any, between the executives’ and/or corporations’ own prior political contributions or statements and the likely political leaning of the corporation’s consumer base.

Political Contributions Risk

Rates the corporation based on the magnitude of the executives’ and/or corporations’ total political contributions to politicians and PACs, benchmarked to sector, and the weighted nature of those contributions as between political parties.

Associational Risk

Rates the corporation based on its executives’ and/or the corporation’s own prior political contributions and/or public association with particularly controversial people or high-profile politicians or PACs.

Brand Visibility Risk

Rates the corporation's risk relative to sector with higher risk being associated with higher brand visibility

Motorola

MSI
3
Companies list

Public Statements Risk

2

Motorola CEO Greg Brown served on President George W. Bush's National Security Telecommunications Advisory committee, where he made policy recommendations regarding communications and network services. He also served on President Barack Obama's Management Advisory Board. The company does not assume stances on political debates. Their site features sections on both DEI and ESG, accessible from the header menu.

Political Contributions Risk

4

Motorola contributes largely to Red causes, and mostly through its PAC. Contribution level is very high and on the higher end of spectrum when benchmarked to the Information Technology Sector. Stronger partisanship is typical of the IT sector but tends to lean Democratic, making Motorola atypical. Motorola contributes to controversial political figures like Mitch McConnell and Steve Scalise. The risk is elevated by both contribution size and partisanship.

Political Dichotomy Risk

3

Motorola has a diverse customer base from its widely-demanded products and primarily operates with B2C model. Combined with the company's high contribution level, skewed in favor of Republicans, Motorola tends to donate to semi-controversial Republican figures. However, the company also avoids controversial media campaigns that could provoke backlash. The sales strategy is largely centered on price, indicating consumers' lacking in disposable income to boycott for substitutes. But, their donation profile makes them stand out in the Blue sea of the tech world, elevating the risk level.

Associational Risk

3

The company has contributed to Mitch McConnell and Steve Scalise. They have also received press over contributions to Governor DeSantis. Research revealed no other controversial associations on social media or other platforms.

Brand Visibility Risk

3

Motorola is a consumer electronics brand, selling based on features and price, though the sector has somewhat high brand loyalty. The company is primarily B2C, with good awareness but low market share, creating a moderate risk level.

Political Hazard (pH) Ratings Explained

A corporation’s Political Hazard Rating, or pH rating, is an overall assessment of the corporation’s likelihood of facing a material consumer boycott or investor backlash from a controversy caused by the company’s or its executives’ political activities and proclivities. The pH ratings range from 1 to 5, with a higher rating correlating with higher risk. The categories below are the components considered when setting a company’s pH rating.

Public Statements Risk

Rates the corporation based on its executives’ and the corporations’ own prior public political statements, including their frequency and whether they have tended to be, or actually have been, controversial or high-profile.

Political Dichotomy Risk

Rates the corporation based on the dichotomy, if any, between the executives’ and/or corporations’ own prior political contributions or statements and the likely political leaning of the corporation’s consumer base.

Political Contributions Risk

Rates the corporation based on the magnitude of the executives’ and/or corporations’ total political contributions to politicians and PACs, benchmarked to sector, and the weighted nature of those contributions as between political parties.

Associational Risk

Rates the corporation based on its executives’ and/or the corporation’s own prior political contributions and/or public association with particularly controversial people or high-profile politicians or PACs.

Brand Visibility Risk

Rates the corporation's risk relative to sector with higher risk being associated with higher brand visibility

Motorola

MSI
3
Companies list

Public Statements Risk

2

Motorola CEO Greg Brown served on President George W. Bush's National Security Telecommunications Advisory committee, where he made policy recommendations regarding communications and network services. He also served on President Barack Obama's Management Advisory Board. The company does not assume stances on political debates. Their site features sections on both DEI and ESG, accessible from the header menu.

Political Contributions Risk

4

Motorola contributes largely to Red causes, and mostly through its PAC. Contribution level is very high and on the higher end of spectrum when benchmarked to the Information Technology Sector. Stronger partisanship is typical of the IT sector but tends to lean Democratic, making Motorola atypical. Motorola contributes to controversial political figures like Mitch McConnell and Steve Scalise. The risk is elevated by both contribution size and partisanship.

Political Dichotomy Risk

3

Motorola has a diverse customer base from its widely-demanded products and primarily operates with B2C model. Combined with the company's high contribution level, skewed in favor of Republicans, Motorola tends to donate to semi-controversial Republican figures. However, the company also avoids controversial media campaigns that could provoke backlash. The sales strategy is largely centered on price, indicating consumers' lacking in disposable income to boycott for substitutes. But, their donation profile makes them stand out in the Blue sea of the tech world, elevating the risk level.

Associational Risk

3

The company has contributed to Mitch McConnell and Steve Scalise. They have also received press over contributions to Governor DeSantis. Research revealed no other controversial associations on social media or other platforms.

Brand Visibility Risk

3

Motorola is a consumer electronics brand, selling based on features and price, though the sector has somewhat high brand loyalty. The company is primarily B2C, with good awareness but low market share, creating a moderate risk level.

Political Hazard (pH) Ratings Explained

A corporation’s Political Hazard Rating, or pH rating, is an overall assessment of the corporation’s likelihood of facing a material consumer boycott or investor backlash from a controversy caused by the company’s or its executives’ political activities and proclivities. The pH ratings range from 1 to 5, with a higher rating correlating with higher risk. The categories below are the components considered when setting a company’s pH rating.

Public Statements Risk

Rates the corporation based on its executives’ and the corporations’ own prior public political statements, including their frequency and whether they have tended to be, or actually have been, controversial or high-profile.

Political Dichotomy Risk

Rates the corporation based on the dichotomy, if any, between the executives’ and/or corporations’ own prior political contributions or statements and the likely political leaning of the corporation’s consumer base.

Political Contributions Risk

Rates the corporation based on the magnitude of the executives’ and/or corporations’ total political contributions to politicians and PACs, benchmarked to sector, and the weighted nature of those contributions as between political parties.

Associational Risk

Rates the corporation based on its executives’ and/or the corporation’s own prior political contributions and/or public association with particularly controversial people or high-profile politicians or PACs.

Brand Visibility Risk

Rates the corporation's risk relative to sector with higher risk being associated with higher brand visibility

See this company on INDEXALIGN

Read the reports of these top S&P 500 companies

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

AB InBev

AT&T

Adobe

Advance Auto Parts

Alphabet

Amazon

American Express

Apple

AutoZone

Bath & Body Works

Best Buy

Biogen

Brown Forman

CVS

Caesar's

Campbell

CarMax

Carnival

Charter

Chipotle

Clorox

Coke

Colgate Palmolive

Comcast

Constellation Brands

Costco

Digital Realty

Disney

Dollar General

Dollar Tree

Domino's

EA

Equinix

Estee Lauder

Etsy

Expedia

FedEx

First Energy

Ford

Fox

Garmin

General Mills

General Motors

Hasbro

Hershey's

Hilton

Home Depot

Hormel

Intuit

JM Smucker

JP Morgan

Keurig Dr. Pepper

Kraft Heinz

Kroger

Las Vegas Sands

Lowe's

MGM Resorts

Marriott

McCormick

McDonald's

Meta

Microsoft

Moderna

Molson Coors

Monster

Motorola

Netflix

Nike

Norwegian Cruise

Nvidia

Oracle

Paramount

Pepsi

Pfizer

Procter & Gamble

Ralph Lauren

Ross

Royal Caribbean

Salesforce

Starbucks

Sysco

T-Mobile

TJX

Take Two

Tapestry

Target

Tesla

Tyson

UPS

Ulta

United Airlines

VF Corp

Verizon

Walgreens

Walmart

Warner Bros. Discovery

Waste Management

Wynn

Yum!

eBay

“As a political data company, we are uniquely positioned to measure a company’s pH.” Abigail Wuest, CEO