Clorox

CLX
2.7
Companies list

Public Statements Risk

2

Clorox's current CEO is Linda Rendle. Her social media posts are generally about company events. She did post about gender equality for Women's History Month as well as about sustainability.

Political Contributions Risk

3

Clorox contributes to Democrats over Republicans at approximately a 3:2 ratio with the vast majority coming from the company PAC. The company's combined contribution magnitude is medium, but appears to be in the lower-end of the contribution spectrum when benchmarked to the Consumer Staples sector. The company's blue lean is also consistent with the sector but they are slightly less partisan and in larger magnitude compared to direct competitors like Colgate Palmolive and Kimberly Clark.

Political Dichotomy Risk

2

Clorox has an extremely diverse customer base due to the variety of products they produce combined with their product line's unavoidable utility. While they tend to donate more to Democrats, the company itself has stayed relatively quiet on the subject of politics. Clorox is a powerhouse in their sector, resulting in many dedicated consumers that see their goods as cleaning products and nothing else. This results in a lower risk profile.

Associational Risk

4

There is not much news connecting the company to politicians, except an article revealing that the company's PAC donated $2000 to Cindy Hyde-Smith who voted to overturn the 2020 election results. Clorox's social media pages do not provide any links to controversial figures. The company has donated to controversial politicians Hillary Clinton and Kamala Harris.

Brand Visibility Risk

3

Clorox is a product-focused company that sells with its brand. It's incredibly well known with a good market share. They also compete on price so the risk is slightly lowered.

Political Hazard (pH) Ratings Explained

A corporation’s Political Hazard Rating, or pH rating, is an overall assessment of the corporation’s likelihood of facing a material consumer boycott or investor backlash from a controversy caused by the company’s or its executives’ political activities and proclivities. The pH ratings range from 1 to 5, with a higher rating correlating with higher risk. The categories below are the components considered when setting a company’s pH rating.

Public Statements Risk

Rates the corporation based on its executives’ and the corporations’ own prior public political statements, including their frequency and whether they have tended to be, or actually have been, controversial or high-profile.

Political Dichotomy Risk

Rates the corporation based on the dichotomy, if any, between the executives’ and/or corporations’ own prior political contributions or statements and the likely political leaning of the corporation’s consumer base.

Political Contributions Risk

Rates the corporation based on the magnitude of the executives’ and/or corporations’ total political contributions to politicians and PACs, benchmarked to sector, and the weighted nature of those contributions as between political parties.

Associational Risk

Rates the corporation based on its executives’ and/or the corporation’s own prior political contributions and/or public association with particularly controversial people or high-profile politicians or PACs.

Brand Visibility Risk

Rates the corporation's risk relative to sector with higher risk being associated with higher brand visibility

Clorox

CLX
2.7
Companies list

Public Statements Risk

2

Clorox's current CEO is Linda Rendle. Her social media posts are generally about company events. She did post about gender equality for Women's History Month as well as about sustainability.

Political Contributions Risk

3

Clorox contributes to Democrats over Republicans at approximately a 3:2 ratio with the vast majority coming from the company PAC. The company's combined contribution magnitude is medium, but appears to be in the lower-end of the contribution spectrum when benchmarked to the Consumer Staples sector. The company's blue lean is also consistent with the sector but they are slightly less partisan and in larger magnitude compared to direct competitors like Colgate Palmolive and Kimberly Clark.

Political Dichotomy Risk

2

Clorox has an extremely diverse customer base due to the variety of products they produce combined with their product line's unavoidable utility. While they tend to donate more to Democrats, the company itself has stayed relatively quiet on the subject of politics. Clorox is a powerhouse in their sector, resulting in many dedicated consumers that see their goods as cleaning products and nothing else. This results in a lower risk profile.

Associational Risk

4

There is not much news connecting the company to politicians, except an article revealing that the company's PAC donated $2000 to Cindy Hyde-Smith who voted to overturn the 2020 election results. Clorox's social media pages do not provide any links to controversial figures. The company has donated to controversial politicians Hillary Clinton and Kamala Harris.

Brand Visibility Risk

3

Clorox is a product-focused company that sells with its brand. It's incredibly well known with a good market share. They also compete on price so the risk is slightly lowered.

Political Hazard (pH) Ratings Explained

A corporation’s Political Hazard Rating, or pH rating, is an overall assessment of the corporation’s likelihood of facing a material consumer boycott or investor backlash from a controversy caused by the company’s or its executives’ political activities and proclivities. The pH ratings range from 1 to 5, with a higher rating correlating with higher risk. The categories below are the components considered when setting a company’s pH rating.

Public Statements Risk

Rates the corporation based on its executives’ and the corporations’ own prior public political statements, including their frequency and whether they have tended to be, or actually have been, controversial or high-profile.

Political Dichotomy Risk

Rates the corporation based on the dichotomy, if any, between the executives’ and/or corporations’ own prior political contributions or statements and the likely political leaning of the corporation’s consumer base.

Political Contributions Risk

Rates the corporation based on the magnitude of the executives’ and/or corporations’ total political contributions to politicians and PACs, benchmarked to sector, and the weighted nature of those contributions as between political parties.

Associational Risk

Rates the corporation based on its executives’ and/or the corporation’s own prior political contributions and/or public association with particularly controversial people or high-profile politicians or PACs.

Brand Visibility Risk

Rates the corporation's risk relative to sector with higher risk being associated with higher brand visibility

Clorox

CLX
2.7
Companies list

Public Statements Risk

2

Clorox's current CEO is Linda Rendle. Her social media posts are generally about company events. She did post about gender equality for Women's History Month as well as about sustainability.

Political Contributions Risk

3

Clorox contributes to Democrats over Republicans at approximately a 3:2 ratio with the vast majority coming from the company PAC. The company's combined contribution magnitude is medium, but appears to be in the lower-end of the contribution spectrum when benchmarked to the Consumer Staples sector. The company's blue lean is also consistent with the sector but they are slightly less partisan and in larger magnitude compared to direct competitors like Colgate Palmolive and Kimberly Clark.

Political Dichotomy Risk

2

Clorox has an extremely diverse customer base due to the variety of products they produce combined with their product line's unavoidable utility. While they tend to donate more to Democrats, the company itself has stayed relatively quiet on the subject of politics. Clorox is a powerhouse in their sector, resulting in many dedicated consumers that see their goods as cleaning products and nothing else. This results in a lower risk profile.

Associational Risk

4

There is not much news connecting the company to politicians, except an article revealing that the company's PAC donated $2000 to Cindy Hyde-Smith who voted to overturn the 2020 election results. Clorox's social media pages do not provide any links to controversial figures. The company has donated to controversial politicians Hillary Clinton and Kamala Harris.

Brand Visibility Risk

3

Clorox is a product-focused company that sells with its brand. It's incredibly well known with a good market share. They also compete on price so the risk is slightly lowered.

Political Hazard (pH) Ratings Explained

A corporation’s Political Hazard Rating, or pH rating, is an overall assessment of the corporation’s likelihood of facing a material consumer boycott or investor backlash from a controversy caused by the company’s or its executives’ political activities and proclivities. The pH ratings range from 1 to 5, with a higher rating correlating with higher risk. The categories below are the components considered when setting a company’s pH rating.

Public Statements Risk

Rates the corporation based on its executives’ and the corporations’ own prior public political statements, including their frequency and whether they have tended to be, or actually have been, controversial or high-profile.

Political Dichotomy Risk

Rates the corporation based on the dichotomy, if any, between the executives’ and/or corporations’ own prior political contributions or statements and the likely political leaning of the corporation’s consumer base.

Political Contributions Risk

Rates the corporation based on the magnitude of the executives’ and/or corporations’ total political contributions to politicians and PACs, benchmarked to sector, and the weighted nature of those contributions as between political parties.

Associational Risk

Rates the corporation based on its executives’ and/or the corporation’s own prior political contributions and/or public association with particularly controversial people or high-profile politicians or PACs.

Brand Visibility Risk

Rates the corporation's risk relative to sector with higher risk being associated with higher brand visibility

Clorox

CLX
2.7
Companies list

Public Statements Risk

2

Clorox's current CEO is Linda Rendle. Her social media posts are generally about company events. She did post about gender equality for Women's History Month as well as about sustainability.

Political Contributions Risk

3

Clorox contributes to Democrats over Republicans at approximately a 3:2 ratio with the vast majority coming from the company PAC. The company's combined contribution magnitude is medium, but appears to be in the lower-end of the contribution spectrum when benchmarked to the Consumer Staples sector. The company's blue lean is also consistent with the sector but they are slightly less partisan and in larger magnitude compared to direct competitors like Colgate Palmolive and Kimberly Clark.

Political Dichotomy Risk

2

Clorox has an extremely diverse customer base due to the variety of products they produce combined with their product line's unavoidable utility. While they tend to donate more to Democrats, the company itself has stayed relatively quiet on the subject of politics. Clorox is a powerhouse in their sector, resulting in many dedicated consumers that see their goods as cleaning products and nothing else. This results in a lower risk profile.

Associational Risk

4

There is not much news connecting the company to politicians, except an article revealing that the company's PAC donated $2000 to Cindy Hyde-Smith who voted to overturn the 2020 election results. Clorox's social media pages do not provide any links to controversial figures. The company has donated to controversial politicians Hillary Clinton and Kamala Harris.

Brand Visibility Risk

3

Clorox is a product-focused company that sells with its brand. It's incredibly well known with a good market share. They also compete on price so the risk is slightly lowered.

Political Hazard (pH) Ratings Explained

A corporation’s Political Hazard Rating, or pH rating, is an overall assessment of the corporation’s likelihood of facing a material consumer boycott or investor backlash from a controversy caused by the company’s or its executives’ political activities and proclivities. The pH ratings range from 1 to 5, with a higher rating correlating with higher risk. The categories below are the components considered when setting a company’s pH rating.

Public Statements Risk

Rates the corporation based on its executives’ and the corporations’ own prior public political statements, including their frequency and whether they have tended to be, or actually have been, controversial or high-profile.

Political Dichotomy Risk

Rates the corporation based on the dichotomy, if any, between the executives’ and/or corporations’ own prior political contributions or statements and the likely political leaning of the corporation’s consumer base.

Political Contributions Risk

Rates the corporation based on the magnitude of the executives’ and/or corporations’ total political contributions to politicians and PACs, benchmarked to sector, and the weighted nature of those contributions as between political parties.

Associational Risk

Rates the corporation based on its executives’ and/or the corporation’s own prior political contributions and/or public association with particularly controversial people or high-profile politicians or PACs.

Brand Visibility Risk

Rates the corporation's risk relative to sector with higher risk being associated with higher brand visibility

Clorox

CLX
2.7
Companies list

Public Statements Risk

2

Clorox's current CEO is Linda Rendle. Her social media posts are generally about company events. She did post about gender equality for Women's History Month as well as about sustainability.

Political Contributions Risk

3

Clorox contributes to Democrats over Republicans at approximately a 3:2 ratio with the vast majority coming from the company PAC. The company's combined contribution magnitude is medium, but appears to be in the lower-end of the contribution spectrum when benchmarked to the Consumer Staples sector. The company's blue lean is also consistent with the sector but they are slightly less partisan and in larger magnitude compared to direct competitors like Colgate Palmolive and Kimberly Clark.

Political Dichotomy Risk

2

Clorox has an extremely diverse customer base due to the variety of products they produce combined with their product line's unavoidable utility. While they tend to donate more to Democrats, the company itself has stayed relatively quiet on the subject of politics. Clorox is a powerhouse in their sector, resulting in many dedicated consumers that see their goods as cleaning products and nothing else. This results in a lower risk profile.

Associational Risk

4

There is not much news connecting the company to politicians, except an article revealing that the company's PAC donated $2000 to Cindy Hyde-Smith who voted to overturn the 2020 election results. Clorox's social media pages do not provide any links to controversial figures. The company has donated to controversial politicians Hillary Clinton and Kamala Harris.

Brand Visibility Risk

3

Clorox is a product-focused company that sells with its brand. It's incredibly well known with a good market share. They also compete on price so the risk is slightly lowered.

Political Hazard (pH) Ratings Explained

A corporation’s Political Hazard Rating, or pH rating, is an overall assessment of the corporation’s likelihood of facing a material consumer boycott or investor backlash from a controversy caused by the company’s or its executives’ political activities and proclivities. The pH ratings range from 1 to 5, with a higher rating correlating with higher risk. The categories below are the components considered when setting a company’s pH rating.

Public Statements Risk

Rates the corporation based on its executives’ and the corporations’ own prior public political statements, including their frequency and whether they have tended to be, or actually have been, controversial or high-profile.

Political Dichotomy Risk

Rates the corporation based on the dichotomy, if any, between the executives’ and/or corporations’ own prior political contributions or statements and the likely political leaning of the corporation’s consumer base.

Political Contributions Risk

Rates the corporation based on the magnitude of the executives’ and/or corporations’ total political contributions to politicians and PACs, benchmarked to sector, and the weighted nature of those contributions as between political parties.

Associational Risk

Rates the corporation based on its executives’ and/or the corporation’s own prior political contributions and/or public association with particularly controversial people or high-profile politicians or PACs.

Brand Visibility Risk

Rates the corporation's risk relative to sector with higher risk being associated with higher brand visibility

See this company on INDEXALIGN

Read the reports of these top S&P 500 companies

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

AB InBev

AT&T

Adobe

Advance Auto Parts

Alphabet

Amazon

American Express

Apple

AutoZone

Bath & Body Works

Best Buy

Biogen

Brown Forman

CVS

Caesar's

Campbell

CarMax

Carnival

Charter

Chipotle

Clorox

Coke

Colgate Palmolive

Comcast

Constellation Brands

Costco

Digital Realty

Disney

Dollar General

Dollar Tree

Domino's

EA

Equinix

Estee Lauder

Etsy

Expedia

FedEx

First Energy

Ford

Fox

Garmin

General Mills

General Motors

Hasbro

Hershey's

Hilton

Home Depot

Hormel

Intuit

JM Smucker

JP Morgan

Keurig Dr. Pepper

Kraft Heinz

Kroger

Las Vegas Sands

Lowe's

MGM Resorts

Marriott

McCormick

McDonald's

Meta

Microsoft

Moderna

Molson Coors

Monster

Motorola

Netflix

Nike

Norwegian Cruise

Nvidia

Oracle

Paramount

Pepsi

Pfizer

Procter & Gamble

Ralph Lauren

Ross

Royal Caribbean

Salesforce

Starbucks

Sysco

T-Mobile

TJX

Take Two

Tapestry

Target

Tesla

Tyson

UPS

Ulta

United Airlines

VF Corp

Verizon

Walgreens

Walmart

Warner Bros. Discovery

Waste Management

Wynn

Yum!

eBay

“As a political data company, we are uniquely positioned to measure a company’s pH.” Abigail Wuest, CEO